From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr repository ready? Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:52:14 +0200 Message-ID: <83ocmnnc5d.fsf@gnu.org> References: <877htl53tc.fsf@telefonica.net> <87ws1ku7zd.fsf@red-bean.com> <87hbso4s13.fsf@telefonica.net> <83aaygoy90.fsf@gnu.org> <87vdh36d48.fsf@telefonica.net> <831vjrptha.fsf@gnu.org> <87einr63b6.fsf@telefonica.net> <83y6lzo9e7.fsf@gnu.org> <871vjr750o.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83tywnnq34.fsf@gnu.org> <873a475bsr.fsf@telefonica.net> <87ocmu7x9c.fsf@red-bean.com> <87zl6crij4.fsf@red-bean.com> <87hbsifdsr.fsf@telefonica.net> <87d435sn0b.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87hbsgc4l8.fsf@telefonica.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1259340773 3308 80.91.229.12 (27 Nov 2009 16:52:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:52:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 27 17:52:45 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NE43o-0006iK-OC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:52:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59941 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NE43o-0007gy-1Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:52:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NE43j-0007gl-8r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:52:39 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NE43e-0007c6-Et for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:52:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41431 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NE43e-0007c3-C9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:52:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:49742) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NE43c-0003D2-DI; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:52:32 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KTS007000XXWR00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:52:27 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.37.193]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KTS0083R1JE5Z10@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:52:27 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87hbsgc4l8.fsf@telefonica.net> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:117874 Archived-At: > From: =C3=93scar_Fuentes > Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:30:59 +0100 > Cc: Richard Stallman >=20 > Richard Stallman writes: >=20 > > I find it rather complex, so I will use one of these two simpler > > suggestions. I think we should inform people about these options= . >=20 > Much of the confusion comes from the abundance of workflows bzr > allows. Note that Richard didn't say it was confusing. He said it was complex. > I'm starting to think that pointing out the existence of > alternative workflows only added confusion to the discussion Personally, I don't think having several workflows adds to confusion. If they are clearly explained, and if the pros and cons of each one are described, I can easily make up my mind, and I don't think I'm special in this regard. > Maybe the right approach was to describe a "blessed" > workflow on the wiki and behave as if the other approaches didn't > exist. I personally would regret that. I think I'm grown-up enough to not have me spoon-fed. Give me the information and let me decide myself what's best for me, even if I make some mistakes on the way. > If there is real interest on using one of those introductory workfl= ows > I'll write the documentation FWIW, I'd welcome more information. Thanks. > BTW, I pretend to explain the "bound branch" approach, always > emphasizing that is a middle point between CVS and Bazaar and that = the > user should eventually transition to a fully dVCS practice What is ``full dVCS practice''? Can you describe it (or was it already described in this thread)?