What is the difference between the src/oo/ and src/oo-spd/ directories?

What is the difference between the src/oo/ and src/oo-spd/ directories?

[Lennart Borgman]

Why is emacs.exe sometimes placed in the first and sometimes in the second?
What is the reason for having both?

Re: What is the difference between the src/oo/ and src/oo-spd/ directories?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 18:13:22 +0200
> 
> Why is emacs.exe sometimes placed in the first and sometimes in the second?

It depends on whether you configure with or without --no-opt.

> What is the reason for having both?

To allow you to have both optimized and unoptimized builds of the same
sources.

Re: What is the difference between the src/oo/ and src/oo-spd/ directories?

[Lennart Borgman]

On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 18:13:22 +0200
>>
>> Why is emacs.exe sometimes placed in the first and sometimes in the second?
>
> It depends on whether you configure with or without --no-opt.
>
>> What is the reason for having both?
>
> To allow you to have both optimized and unoptimized builds of the same
> sources.

Thanks, but how do you use that? Don't you to rebuild all the C
sources to use it? And don't you do "make install" after that?

Re: What is the difference between the src/oo/ and src/oo-spd/ directories?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 19:28:13 +0200
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> >> From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
> >> Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 18:13:22 +0200
> >>
> >> Why is emacs.exe sometimes placed in the first and sometimes in the second?
> >
> > It depends on whether you configure with or without --no-opt.
> >
> >> What is the reason for having both?
> >
> > To allow you to have both optimized and unoptimized builds of the same
> > sources.
> 
> Thanks, but how do you use that? Don't you to rebuild all the C
> sources to use it?

Yes, but so what?  It only takes a couple of minutes.

> And don't you do "make install" after that?

You don't have to if you don't want.  You can run the executable from
its src/oo/i386 directory.

Re: What is the difference between the src/oo/ and src/oo-spd/ directories?

[Lennart Borgman]

On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 19:28:13 +0200
>> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
>>
>> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> >> From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
>> >> Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 18:13:22 +0200
>> >>
>> >> Why is emacs.exe sometimes placed in the first and sometimes in the second?
>> >
>> > It depends on whether you configure with or without --no-opt.
>> >
>> >> What is the reason for having both?
>> >
>> > To allow you to have both optimized and unoptimized builds of the same
>> > sources.
>>
>> Thanks, but how do you use that? Don't you to rebuild all the C
>> sources to use it?
>
> Yes, but so what?  It only takes a couple of minutes.
>
>> And don't you do "make install" after that?
>
> You don't have to if you don't want.  You can run the executable from
> its src/oo/i386 directory.


Thanks, I see. Yes, it seems useful.

Re: What is the difference between the src/oo/ and src/oo-spd/ directories?

[Sean Sieger]

    >> >> Why is emacs.exe sometimes placed in the first and sometimes
    >> >> in the second?
    >> >
    >> > It depends on whether you configure with or without --no-opt.
    >> >
    >> >> What is the reason for having both?
    >> >
    >> > To allow you to have both optimized and unoptimized builds of the same
    >> > sources.
    >>
    >> Thanks, but how do you use that? Don't you to rebuild all the C
    >> sources to use it?
    >
    > Yes, but so what?  It only takes a couple of minutes.
    >
    >> And don't you do "make install" after that?
    >
    > You don't have to if you don't want.  You can run the executable from
    > its src/oo/i386 directory.


    Thanks, I see. Yes, it seems useful.

Right, thanks, Eli.