From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Patch for fields of `struct buffer' Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 14:50:53 +0200 Message-ID: <83oc6zho0i.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ei7xiils.fsf@gnu.org> <83aailidez.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296305813 29203 80.91.229.12 (29 Jan 2011 12:56:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 12:56:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: tromey@redhat.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 29 13:56:49 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PjAMD-0001kv-2D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 13:56:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59508 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PjAGB-0005f3-MC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 07:50:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51700 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PjAG6-0005ep-Sl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 07:50:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PjAG4-0006Io-V4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 07:50:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:37223) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PjAG4-0006IZ-N7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 07:50:28 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LFS00700AQ55300@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 14:50:26 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.46.39]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LFS0070WBNYGC10@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 14:50:23 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <83aailidez.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135204 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:29:56 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > From: Tom Tromey > > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 01:58:19 -0700 > > > > >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > > Eli> Could this please be postponed until the Windows build is working > > Eli> again? > > > > Sure, I think that is a good idea. Could you post a note when it works? > > Will do. A lot of people are impatient ;-) I have now committed to the trunk revision 103022 which should repair the Emacs build on MS-Windows. People who build Emacs on Windows please try it and report any problems left. Caveats: . Bootstrap wasn't tested. If someone has time for that, please try and report any left-overs. . I don't have MSVC installed, so I only built using MinGW. . I needed to port revision 100423 from emacs-23 branch, which was not yet merged into trunk, to fix the bug introduced by the branch revision 100409 (which was already merged into trunk). So when the next merge from the branch into trunk is done, this could cause extra conflicts; sorry about that.