From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Any objection to adding a unicode footnote style? Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 17:30:25 +0300 Message-ID: <83oc3djmda.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1304865070 18919 80.91.229.12 (8 May 2011 14:31:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 14:31:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 08 16:31:06 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QJ50h-0004fe-7U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 May 2011 16:31:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53609 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJ50g-0002D7-Pi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 May 2011 10:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55827) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJ50d-0002Cq-Pc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2011 10:31:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJ50d-0007EU-0c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2011 10:30:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:44832) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJ50c-0007EN-Q7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2011 10:30:58 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LKV00M00SABH300@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 May 2011 17:30:21 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.234.175]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LKV00MKLSAK0NE0@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sun, 08 May 2011 17:30:21 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139222 Archived-At: > From: Leo > Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 18:11:47 +0800 >=20 > Any objection to adding a new style `unicode' to footnote-mode? Maybe that's a good idea, but your attachment is illegible, precisely in those lines which matter: it shows funny Japanese characters instead of what you probably meant, and makes it very hard to judge the patch. For example, this character: =09 character: =EF=BE=82 (65410, #o177602, #xff82) preferred charset: unicode (Unicode (ISO10646)) =09 code point: 0xFF82 =09 syntax: w =09which means: word =09 category: .:Base, j:Japanese, k:Katakana, |:line breakable =09buffer code: #xEF #xBE #x82 =09 file code: not encodable by coding system undecided =09 display: by this font (glyph code) uniscribe:-outline-Arial Unicode MS-normal-normal-normal-sans-1= 5-*-*-*-p-*-jisx0208*-* (#x1A5C) Character code properties: customize what to show name: HALFWIDTH KATAKANA LETTER TU general-category: Lo (Letter, Other) decomposition: (narrow 12484) (narrow '=E3=83=84')