From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9760: 24.0.50; crash Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 22:56:50 +0200 Message-ID: <83obxivur1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83lisnjk5b.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1318712312 18811 80.91.229.12 (15 Oct 2011 20:58:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 20:58:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9760@debbugs.gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 15 22:58:26 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RFBJJ-0006op-SP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 22:58:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41358 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFBJJ-00032W-GV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 16:58:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39571) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFBJG-00032Q-1h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 16:58:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFBJF-0008UB-1H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 16:58:22 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59440) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFBJE-0008U7-Su for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 16:58:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RFBJu-00067V-9X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 16:59:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 20:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9760 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9760-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9760.131871232323500 (code B ref 9760); Sat, 15 Oct 2011 20:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9760) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2011 20:58:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RFBJa-00066y-LY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 16:58:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RFBJZ-00066n-53 for 9760@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 16:58:42 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LT400N00KL02S00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 9760@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 22:56:47 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.212.197]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LT400L17KUKTY91@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 15 Oct 2011 22:56:45 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 16:59:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:52671 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 15:44:15 -0400 > From: Richard Stallman > CC: 9760@debbugs.gnu.org > > I'm confused by the fact that you say you > fetched the sources today, but emacs-version still shows 24.0.50, when > it should have been 24.0.90. > > That may be because I did not do a bootstrap recently. It takes a long time. > I just compiled the C and Lisp files. I don't think you need to bootstrap to have the version string updated. I think running `configure' is enough. > If this is crucial, I will do a bootstrap tonight to check. Bootstrapping is not crucial, but I'd prefer that you run `configure' next time you build, and see if the problem persists. > But I think that the fact that I'm running on a Longxin (MIPS-like) > rather than an x86 is more likely to make the difference. Possibly. > #0 0x0043ff40 in set_cursor_from_row (w=0x8ee928, row=0xc558cc, > matrix=0x8eef58, delta=0, delta_bytes=0, dy=0, dvpos=0) at xdisp.c:13693 Line 13693 of xdisp.c is this: while (/* not marched to end of glyph row */ This cannot possibly crash. Was this an abort or a SIGSEGV? If the latter, which variable around line 13693 is invalid? Is it `glyph' or `row'?