From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10708: 24.0.93; desktop.el doesn't restore buffers visiting files in archives Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:45:55 +0200 Message-ID: <83obtfex8s.fsf@gnu.org> References: <7r62fo9que.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328284005 5655 80.91.229.3 (3 Feb 2012 15:46:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 15:46:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10708@debbugs.gnu.org To: Kevin Rodgers Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 03 16:46:44 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RtLLS-0002qS-5A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:46:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57621 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtLLR-0001xT-HC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:46:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38661) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtLLL-0001w8-VL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:46:36 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtLLJ-0004pX-A2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:46:31 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48822) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RtLLJ-0004pT-8R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:46:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtLLq-0004RV-8n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:47:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10708 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10708-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10708.132828400217049 (code B ref 10708); Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10708) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Feb 2012 15:46:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52445 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtLLU-0004Qv-C4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:46:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:52485) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RtLLQ-0004QM-Nm for 10708@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:46:38 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LYT00600Q9WTG00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 10708@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:45:56 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.37.111]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LYT00642QGJ6580@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:45:56 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56424 Archived-At: > From: Kevin Rodgers > Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:48:03 -0700 > > On 2/3/12 6:39 AM, Stefan Monnier wrote: > >> IOW, desktop.el does not realize that this form of file names means an > >> archive member, and therefore does not extract that member when > >> restoring the desktop. > > > > Of course, the "right" fix is to implement a file-name-handler > > for tarballs (and other archives), > > Is "archive!member" a good syntax? We are using it for a long time, and no one ever complained. > i.e. what about regular files that have "!" in their name? desktop.el will need to look for a literal file first, and only then for an archive member. > (not to mention archives or archive members that have "!" in their > name) That is already handled, AFAIR.