From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Can't build latest emacs on MSW + CRLF display issue Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 18:20:25 +0300 Message-ID: <83ob8jf9dy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <807gfadm22.fsf@gmail.com> <83ob8lhkys.fsf@gnu.org> <83ioyth8pd.fsf@gnu.org> <83d2p1h5j7.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1377616833 17161 80.91.229.3 (27 Aug 2013 15:20:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:20:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 27 17:20:35 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VEL4G-0004DU-4N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:20:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57023 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VEL4F-0002MN-JQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:20:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47210) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VEL47-0002LK-73 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:20:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VEL41-0000Ri-Cl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:20:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:45396) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VEL41-0000RV-4I; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:20:13 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MS7008003RJXO00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 18:20:12 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MS7008YO3XNUB50@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 18:20:11 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:163048 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 21:46:03 -0400 > > On the other hand, I can't think of a single reason to _not_ remove it. The only reason is to let people have time to adapt to the change. > If someone turns up and wants to do 1), it will be the least of their > problems to first revert the commit that removed the old method. Not if they build out of the release (or release-like) tarball.