From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16594: 24.3.50; very slow redraw when resizing windows horizontally Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 18:14:36 +0200 Message-ID: <83ob2t78gj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <52EA57F6.70808@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391098512 28683 80.91.229.3 (30 Jan 2014 16:15:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16594@debbugs.gnu.org To: Darren Hoo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 30 17:15:16 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W8uGq-0004Ln-KN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 17:15:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51054 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8uGq-0003vn-5S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:15:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33006) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8uGi-0003pX-Ld for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:15:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8uGd-0000ee-DW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:15:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55831) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8uGd-0000de-AU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:15:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W8uGb-0007KO-QG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:15:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:15:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16594 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16594-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16594.139109848028119 (code B ref 16594); Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:15:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16594) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2014 16:14:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41617 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W8uGF-0007JT-T8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:14:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il ([80.179.55.180]:41428) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W8uGC-0007JI-DA for 16594@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:14:38 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N0800O0029YOG00@mtaout24.012.net.il> for 16594@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 18:14:06 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N080087I2FIMM90@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 18:14:06 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84267 Archived-At: > From: Darren Hoo > Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 23:39:07 +0800 > Cc: 16594@debbugs.gnu.org > > martin rudalics writes: > > > > I checked in a fix such that mouse dragging a line doesn't occur > > pixelwise by default. Does this improve the behavior? I have no idea > > how to interpret the profiler report - when you drag a line it will > > always be the case that most of the cpu is consumed by that. > > I tried the fix, the behavior is worse now. Indeed. Previously, I saw no sluggishness at all here (on MS-Windows), now it is annoyingly apparent.