From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18040: 24.4.50; "@acronym" in "(emacs) Intro" Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 10:17:00 +0300 Message-ID: <83oawl6cnn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ha2g6nyr.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1405754305 4603 80.91.229.3 (19 Jul 2014 07:18:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 07:18:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18040@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 19 09:18:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X8OuO-0000Jp-Es for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 09:18:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53368 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X8OuO-0006J6-0C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 03:18:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54792) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X8OuG-0006I5-70 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 03:18:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X8OuB-0006MC-21 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 03:18:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35373) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X8OuA-0006M8-VC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 03:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X8OuA-0006s9-Ch for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 03:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 07:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18040 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18040-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18040.140575423926363 (code B ref 18040); Sat, 19 Jul 2014 07:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18040) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jul 2014 07:17:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58872 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X8OtS-0006r9-Vf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 03:17:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il ([80.179.55.183]:57299) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X8OtP-0006qt-0N for 18040@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 03:17:16 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N8Y00K0060J5E00@mtaout27.012.net.il> for 18040@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 10:12:54 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N8Y00CVI6PHTCA0@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 10:12:54 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:91654 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Dani Moncayo , 18040@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 23:02:05 -0400 > > > Evidently, Texinfo 4.x doesn't support recursive @acronyms. > > Sounds like a major bug for GNU's official documentation system! Since 5.x solved it, we don't have a case here.