From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18094: 24.4.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 21:45:56 +0300 Message-ID: <83oawdi8ez.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y4vhinh5.fsf@gnu.org> <38b65679-eb9e-4214-a699-3ecc7223e613@default> <83silpijr1.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1406314051 24695 80.91.229.3 (25 Jul 2014 18:47:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 18:47:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18094@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 25 20:47:24 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XAkWW-0002YF-GI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 20:47:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56341 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XAkWU-0008Fh-1A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:47:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37644) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XAkWL-0008EV-NV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:47:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XAkWE-0008Gc-ST for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:47:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42786) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XAkWE-0008GY-Oh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XAkWE-0006vp-EU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:47:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 18:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18094 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 18094-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18094.140631396226561 (code B ref 18094); Fri, 25 Jul 2014 18:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18094) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jul 2014 18:46:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38052 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XAkVC-0006tz-FV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:46:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:49297) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XAkV7-0006tf-Ma for 18094@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:45:57 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N9A00L005JECI00@mtaout28.012.net.il> for 18094@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 21:45:35 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N9A00MDG6RYL520@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 21:45:35 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:91797 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:41:44 -0700 (PDT) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: 18094@debbugs.gnu.org > > > This is not relevant to the issue at hand. The assertion violation > > you've hit means that the base face of the mode line (known as > > 'mode-line') is somehow invalid. Any additional faces you add to the > > strings displayed on the mode line are irrelevant. > > > > Do you have any face remappings for the mode-line face itself? > > Nope. Then I have no idea how the mode-line face could become invalid.