From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19774: 25.0.50; Emacs crashes when C-u on a Gnus folder (reproducible) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 05:31:01 +0200 Message-ID: <83oap28mtm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86y4od9uhm.fsf@example.com> <83bnl9f2fk.fsf@gnu.org> <86y4oc63yh.fsf_-_@example.com> <86egpykcoe.fsf@example.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423539135 20628 80.91.229.3 (10 Feb 2015 03:32:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 03:32:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19774@debbugs.gnu.org To: Sebastien Vauban Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 10 04:32:10 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YL1YY-0008Im-93 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 04:32:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36737 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YL1YX-0006OD-I8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 22:32:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58365) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YL1YT-0006Nj-Us for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 22:32:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YL1YQ-0003P8-PZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 22:32:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47516) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YL1YQ-0003OU-Mw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 22:32:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YL1YQ-00021L-7D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 22:32:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 03:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19774 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19774-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19774.14235390837717 (code B ref 19774); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 03:32:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19774) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2015 03:31:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38756 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YL1Xn-00020P-B5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 22:31:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout25.012.net.il ([80.179.55.181]:54168) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YL1Xk-000209-3O for 19774@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 22:31:21 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout25.012.net.il by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NJJ00L00CV6DD00@mtaout25.012.net.il> for 19774@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 05:26:06 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NJJ00L5PDJI9X20@mtaout25.012.net.il>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 05:26:06 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <86egpykcoe.fsf@example.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:99229 Archived-At: > From: Sebastien Vauban > Cc: 19774@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 22:17:05 +0100 > > For my information -- not trying to push you, as I do have a workaround > anyway now that I've found the recipe --, can you reproduce it? Didn't yet have time to try, sorry.