From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Missing changes in merges from emacs-25 to master
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 19:03:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83oaa64f7l.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwvtwjypib2.fsf-monnier+gmane.emacs.devel@gnu.org> (message from Stefan Monnier on Tue, 22 Mar 2016 12:52:48 -0400)
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 12:52:48 -0400
>
> >> > . Phillip then said "git pull", followed by "git push".
> >> That's a problem in itself, since it leads to annoying commit diffs that
> >> repeat other things, and it changes "git log" ordering in confusing ways
> >> (makes it seem like mainline's development is Philip's and when happened
> >> on master during this time was done on a branch).
> > Indeed. But sometimes this cannot be avoided, because no matter how
> > quick you are, there's always a chance that someone else pushes
> > between your local commit and your push. The probability of this
> > could be brought down significantly by "git pull" before the local
> > commit, but it cannot be eliminated altogether.
>
> "git rebase" should do the trick.
We've been through this: "git rebase" will cause much worse trouble if
you have local merge-commits from feature branches. So I at least
will never use "git rebase" unless I have no other choice.
When we started using Git, I explicitly asked whether we cared about
the messed-up DAG due to these merge-commits, and the answer was "we
don't". So I never looked back, and I guess others didn't, too.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-22 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-20 11:36 Missing changes in merges from emacs-25 to master martin rudalics
2016-03-20 17:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-03-20 18:38 ` martin rudalics
2016-03-20 18:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-03-20 19:15 ` martin rudalics
2016-03-21 7:36 ` Paul Eggert
2016-03-21 9:22 ` martin rudalics
2016-03-21 17:55 ` Paul Eggert
2016-03-22 10:22 ` martin rudalics
2016-03-22 10:36 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-03-22 10:58 ` martin rudalics
2016-03-22 11:32 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-03-22 11:47 ` martin rudalics
2016-03-22 15:20 ` Óscar Fuentes
2016-03-22 17:08 ` martin rudalics
2016-03-22 15:24 ` Noam Postavsky
2016-03-22 17:08 ` martin rudalics
2016-03-21 16:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-03-21 17:55 ` John Wiegley
2016-03-21 17:57 ` Paul Eggert
2016-03-21 18:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-03-21 21:27 ` John Wiegley
2016-03-22 0:17 ` Paul Eggert
2016-03-22 0:52 ` Paul Eggert
2016-03-22 3:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-03-22 16:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-03-22 16:30 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-03-22 16:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-03-22 16:52 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-03-22 17:03 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2016-03-22 18:21 ` Paul Eggert
2016-03-22 18:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-03-23 13:10 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-03-22 18:41 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-03-22 18:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-03-23 2:08 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-03-23 8:07 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-03-22 19:34 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2016-03-22 19:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-03-24 7:18 ` Phillip Lord
2016-03-22 18:32 ` Paul Eggert
2016-03-22 18:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-03-22 19:15 ` Paul Eggert
2016-03-22 19:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-03-22 20:26 ` Paul Eggert
2016-03-22 22:57 ` David Engster
2016-03-22 23:45 ` Paul Eggert
2016-03-25 8:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-03-25 9:14 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-03-25 10:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-03-25 11:50 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-03-25 13:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-03-25 9:15 ` David Engster
2016-03-25 10:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-03-25 11:38 ` David Engster
2016-03-25 14:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-03-25 16:00 ` David Engster
2016-03-25 16:27 ` David Engster
2016-03-25 17:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-03-25 17:52 ` David Engster
2016-03-25 18:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-03-25 19:29 ` Óscar Fuentes
2016-03-25 19:42 ` Paul Eggert
2016-03-26 21:34 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-03-22 17:00 ` Phillip Lord
2016-03-22 18:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-03-22 19:21 ` John Wiegley
2016-03-22 19:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83oaa64f7l.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.