From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 2 release blocking bugs left for 25.1! Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 21:51:21 +0300 Message-ID: <83oa6u5qae.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87fus6vkh9.fsf@russet.org.uk> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466535215 30791 80.91.229.3 (21 Jun 2016 18:53:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 18:53:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: John Wiegley Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 21 20:53:29 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bFQng-00011l-B2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 20:53:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53691 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFQnf-0005XU-NN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:53:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48340) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFQms-0005SO-Cy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:52:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFQmn-0006kH-0I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:52:38 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49852) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFQmm-0006k7-T3; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:52:32 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1107 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bFQmi-0001G0-O6; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:52:31 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from John Wiegley on Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:43:49 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:204649 Archived-At: > From: John Wiegley > Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:43:49 -0700 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > And it's a regression in 25.1 due to the new undo code. > > This does sounds like a blocker, then. What are the repercussions for fixing > the issue? Will it need a full round of pretesting to become ready for the > release candidate? No, I don't think so. It's a localized solution for a localized problem.