From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#30182: Update Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:34:57 +0200 Message-ID: <83o9lbh3lq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k1wdqc4q.fsf@gmail.com> <87inbxqc1l.fsf@gmail.com> <5A631B7F.3030308@gmx.at> <878tcs3j23.fsf@gmail.com> <5A634E53.7010205@gmx.at> <87mv182bzk.fsf@gmail.com> <83a7x7sww6.fsf@gnu.org> <87efmj27d5.fsf@gmail.com> <83vafvqjbf.fsf@gnu.org> <87inbvxdz8.fsf@gmail.com> <5A65AB97.1030401@gmx.at> <87po62kk10.fsf@gmail.com> <831sih23rh.fsf@gnu.org> <5A663490.3050409@gmx.at> <87r2qh5lya.fsf@gmail.com> <5A6C37A7.2020309@gmx.at> <87r2qag5wp.fsf@gmail.com> <5A6D8947.5010207@gmx.at> <83k1w0irux.fsf@gnu.org> <5A702D3B.2070004@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1517319271 23076 195.159.176.226 (30 Jan 2018 13:34:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 13:34:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: m.sujith@gmail.com, 30182@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 30 14:34:27 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1egW38-0004md-7O for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 14:34:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37657 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1egW58-0007FR-W1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:36:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56379) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1egW4z-0007Do-VZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:36:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1egW4w-0006rG-2N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:36:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40771) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1egW4v-0006r9-Qp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:36:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1egW4v-0000tc-KT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:36:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 13:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30182 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 30182-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30182.15173193033377 (code B ref 30182); Tue, 30 Jan 2018 13:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 30182) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2018 13:35:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48668 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1egW3w-0000s2-PV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:35:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36833) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1egW3u-0000rq-LO for 30182@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:34:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1egW3j-0006JP-LY for 30182@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:34:53 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59931) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1egW3j-0006JC-H4; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:34:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2808 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1egW3i-0005u8-V3; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:34:47 -0500 In-reply-to: <5A702D3B.2070004@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Tue, 30 Jan 2018 09:30:51 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:142692 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 09:30:51 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > CC: m.sujith@gmail.com, 30182@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Btw, if using window-at-side-p is so much more efficient than > > window-in-direction, then how come the former is not documented in the > > ELisp manual? Should it be? > > I'm not sure. So far `window-at-side-p' is only used in > `window-in-direction' and to quickly tell whether a mode or header > line can be dragged ("quickly" because that doesn't check for whether > windows have fixed size or are already to small to get resized). It's > not internal (not called `window--at-side-p') because it's called from > mouse.el If you are saying that this is actually an internal function, then I could agree, although I'd at least mention that in the doc string. > Also, `window-at-side-p' could check arguments better as evaluating > (window-at-side-p nil t) shows. Since when are we shy to document buggy APIs? ;-)