From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31702: Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2018 22:11:33 +0300 Message-ID: <83o9gqbc4a.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1528139444 4675 195.159.176.226 (4 Jun 2018 19:10:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 19:10:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 31702@debbugs.gnu.org To: Carlos Pita Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 04 21:10:39 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fPusI-00016P-6D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 21:10:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41562 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fPuuP-0005Me-9Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 15:12:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41811) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fPuth-00053Z-W1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 15:12:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fPute-0005yb-LP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 15:12:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53977) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fPute-0005yX-GH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 15:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fPute-0006E4-9t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 15:12:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2018 19:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31702 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 31702-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31702.152813949523897 (code B ref 31702); Mon, 04 Jun 2018 19:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31702) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jun 2018 19:11:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33641 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fPutD-0006DN-16 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 15:11:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50729) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fPutB-0006DB-Fd for 31702@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 15:11:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fPut3-0005kk-6f for 31702@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 15:11:28 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:55369) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fPut3-0005kT-3Q; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 15:11:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2849 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fPut2-0003F5-Jr; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 15:11:24 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Carlos Pita on Mon, 4 Jun 2018 15:25:28 -0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:146972 Archived-At: > From: Carlos Pita > Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 15:25:28 -0300 > > All in all I'm not sure how to feel about this issue. Despite the > external inconsistency emacs is internally coherent and, according to > what I described in my second comment, I would say it's selecting a > more accurate effective height than the desktop. But, anyway, the > inconsistency is annoying and it's not even possible to get the same > font from the resources file since the size/height granularity is less > than the one offered by emacs face specification. Then maybe you can convince the developers of the desktop to follow Emacs's example ;-)