From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: vc-dir operation is very slow on large git repositories in Emacs 26.1 Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 17:51:11 +0300 Message-ID: <83o9fysyw0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83k1qtsbgi.fsf@gnu.org> <83zhzoqkgv.fsf@gnu.org> <83efgzqjv5.fsf@gnu.org> <83wouqptm6.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1529938157 23516 195.159.176.226 (25 Jun 2018 14:49:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 14:49:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alex Harsanyi Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 25 16:49:13 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fXSno-0005xb-O1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 16:49:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47552 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fXSpv-0002CM-J9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 10:51:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60438) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fXSpo-0002AT-KR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 10:51:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fXSpj-0002MW-P5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 10:51:16 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41370) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fXSpj-0002MF-Lr; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 10:51:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1761 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fXSpj-0004ht-5c; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 10:51:11 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Alex Harsanyi on Mon, 25 Jun 2018 18:40:08 +0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:226707 Archived-At: > From: Alex Harsanyi > Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 18:40:08 +0800 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > So, with a 50 millisecond delay, it takes 83.7 seconds to read the command > output and this is reduced to 1.07 seconds when the delay is set to 0. Thanks for the data, I think the conclusion is clear.