From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36417: [PATCH] Document bookmark annotations in Emacs Manual Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 21:37:25 +0300 Message-ID: <83o92hh7yy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y31lhjwz.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="43616"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 36417-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 28 20:52:21 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hgvyu-000B8u-Om for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 20:52:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35512 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgvys-00052S-1m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 14:52:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38370) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgvlC-000477-Qm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 14:38:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hgvl9-0000Wy-Er for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 14:38:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57654) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hgvl4-0000TG-0V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 14:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgvl3-0003Vy-TI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 14:38:01 -0400 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 18:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 36417 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Mail-Followup-To: 36417@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, stefan@marxist.se Original-Received: via spool by 36417-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D36417.156174706513483 (code D ref 36417); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 18:38:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36417-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2019 18:37:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42964 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgvkm-0003VP-UA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 14:37:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60675) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgvkl-0003VC-Gj for 36417-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 14:37:43 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:32965) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hgvkf-0008Vc-KI; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 14:37:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4106 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hgvkf-0004bV-41; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 14:37:37 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Kangas on Fri, 28 Jun 2019 17:18:58 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:161756 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 17:18:58 +0200 > Cc: 36417@debbugs.gnu.org > > I've attached a new version with hopefully slightly clearer wording. Thanks, pushed. > > > + If you set the variable @code{bookmark-use-annotations} to t, > > ^ > > @code{t} > > Done. Would we also want to do this change while we're at it, or is > it ok as is? > > - If you set the variable @code{bookmark-save-flag} to 1, each command > + If you set the variable @code{bookmark-save-flag} to @code{1}, each command There's no need, as 1 always stands for itself. > sorry about the basic mistakes No need to apologize; thanks for working on this.