From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25097: 25.1; Scratch buffer flashes with emacsclient and xterm Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 17:11:36 +0300 Message-ID: <83o8ngnecn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87vabwl4pf.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25578"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: jake.waksbaum@gmail.com, npostavs@gmail.com, 25097@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 12 16:12:09 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k5rU8-0006Yf-SZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 16:12:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58722 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5rU7-0008UM-VN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 10:12:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60948) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5rU2-0008UE-Kb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 10:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33515) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5rU2-00017Z-BZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 10:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k5rU2-0000CQ-71 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 10:12:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 14:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25097 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 25097-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25097.1597241513748 (code B ref 25097); Wed, 12 Aug 2020 14:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25097) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Aug 2020 14:11:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45061 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k5rTt-0000C0-J0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 10:11:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50732) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k5rTr-0000Bl-Ey for 25097@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 10:11:52 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34520) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5rTm-00015x-0Z; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 10:11:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4097 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1k5rTl-0002pQ-LY; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 10:11:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Tue, 11 Aug 2020 17:35:27 -0700) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:184804 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 17:35:27 -0700 > Cc: Jake , 25097@debbugs.gnu.org > > > That commit actually changed the timeout from a hardcoded 2, and makes > > the timeout configurable. So I think setting xterm-query-timeout to nil > > is the right thing here. Perhaps even a nil xterm-query-timeout should > > be the default? > > > > Here's another case where that seems to help: > > > > https://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/16878/0950c-escape-code-is-inserted-with-typeahead-in-terminal-emacs > > Should we just go ahead and change it, then? From reading the SE > comment, there seems to be no concrete reason to not set it to nil by > default. I don't see how such a conclusion follows from that discussion; what did I miss?