From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11011: Binding S-TAB Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 09:10:21 +0300 Message-ID: <83o8n4bkc2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87aa3jy7u0.fsf@gmail.com> <83y2m9az4w.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23696"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: antoine.levitt@gmail.com, 11011@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 21 08:11:08 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k90Ga-00063T-Q1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 08:11:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33826 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k90GZ-0005wS-Sk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 02:11:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36968) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k90GU-0005wI-BJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 02:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33232) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k90GU-0006Es-2S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 02:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k90GT-0007I7-Tc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 02:11:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 06:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11011 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 11011-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11011.159799023727992 (code B ref 11011); Fri, 21 Aug 2020 06:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11011) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Aug 2020 06:10:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44777 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k90G5-0007HQ-5Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 02:10:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55020) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k90G1-0007HC-Sy for 11011@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 02:10:35 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55264) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k90Fw-000695-CG; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 02:10:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3471 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1k90Fu-0005Jb-WB; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 02:10:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:41:19 -0700) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:185812 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:41:19 -0700 > Cc: antoine.levitt@gmail.com, 11011@debbugs.gnu.org > > > You say "S-TAB", but that's not the key you pressed. You pressed > > , a function key, whereas S-TAB is a shifted ASCII > > character. Try "C-S-i" instead (which will also reveal a minor > > unrelated bug in your recipe ;-). > > Hmm, now I see. This stuff always manages to confuse me. And I guess > it also managed to confused Chong Yidong...? > > Not sure if there's anything to do here, if this is as it should be. > Notabug? Yes, I think this is just a confusing subtlety of function keys vs ASCII keys on a modern keyboard. The OP should have bound , not S-TAB.