From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: master 583cb26 2/3: Improve accuracy in string-replace
 description (bug#43598)
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 19:02:10 +0300
Message-ID: <83o8lok1vh.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20200927124520.25321.62354@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
 <20200927124522.BA20F207E0@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
 <m24kni1bma.fsf@gmail.com>
 <9B45E488-F245-4A94-A492-C60B617A734B@acm.org>
 <m2wo0eyx7c.fsf@gmail.com>
 <CAJnXXojjUAcRVmsZNWQ2j9rSDv76Y0od4yWfVg11k-Q2tf4NYA@mail.gmail.com>
 <m2eemmvwmc.fsf@gmail.com>
 <CAJnXXoi9GnigyD942dMghEttuGTVZ2EPrHtmbseOOg8FHA93CQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <50bea60b-b70b-4a80-b85b-0c9283a033de@default>
 <83o8lplu2v.fsf@gnu.org>
 <dba8b280-a1e1-4174-8944-ddc41756b626@default>
 <83k0wdlqj8.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAJnXXoheYuUtgPFZ3e3OeQimDK+vbh51N5WZgd-R97WnQCuf_Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <83d025l34x.fsf@gnu.org> <m2k0wdukdy.fsf@gmail.com>
 <83zh58k6a8.fsf@gnu.org> <m2d0244ne9.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="26821"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: mattiase@acm.org, john@yates-sheets.org, drew.adams@oracle.com,
 emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 29 18:10:04 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kNICZ-0006tR-Gm
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 18:10:03 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49072 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kNICY-0007SO-FR
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:10:02 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53296)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1kNI58-0000il-9F
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:02:22 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40515)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1kNI56-0007Ix-Fa; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:02:20 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4810 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1kNI55-0006RG-CY; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:02:20 -0400
In-Reply-To: <m2d0244ne9.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Robert Pluim on Tue, 29
 Sep 2020 17:23:58 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:256717
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/256717>

> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
> Cc: mattiase@acm.org,  emacs-devel@gnu.org,  drew.adams@oracle.com,
>   john@yates-sheets.org
> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 17:23:58 +0200
> 
>     Eli> Who did NOT like it, and why?
> 
> Iʼm not going to go back over this already too long thread, but there
> were various calls to have the word 'equal' appear, when my whole
> starting point was that the result string would not be equal to the
> original (except when it is :-))

Right.

I will let others voice objections, and will make the change if none
come up.