From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5605: etags of emacs 23.1 misses template specializations Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 15:11:18 +0300 Message-ID: <83o8cnw3kp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <000901cab1aa$7b30e8c0$7192ba40$@net> <87bl8n71hk.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31048"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 5605@debbugs.gnu.org, purchasebyemail1@comcast.net To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 03 14:12:09 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lomCn-0007sp-Ji for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 14:12:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54246 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lomCm-0005dS-L9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 08:12:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55632) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lomCg-0005cQ-7F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 08:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59502) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lomCf-0000Xd-Vz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 08:12:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lomCf-00020a-S0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 08:12:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 12:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 5605 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 5605-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5605.16227223047695 (code B ref 5605); Thu, 03 Jun 2021 12:12:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5605) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jun 2021 12:11:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42815 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lomCK-0001zz-GZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 08:11:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33612) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lomCF-0001zj-Ik for 5605@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 08:11:39 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38156) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lomC9-000085-VI; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 08:11:30 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2102 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lomC9-0003Sv-FK; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 08:11:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87bl8n71hk.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 03 Jun 2021 11:15:35 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:207945 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 11:15:35 +0200 > Cc: 5605@debbugs.gnu.org > > "Bob" writes: > > > Run "etags" of emacs 23.1 on the attached "Foo.H" file . > > > > The resulting TAGS file indicates "Foo.H" is empty. > > > > Seems to me it should show two definitions for the 2 specializations of `Worker`. > > (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately got no response at > the time.) > > I don't know whether it should or not, but the behaviour of etags in > Emacs 28 is still the same -- it produces an empty TAGS file. 'etags's support for templates is very rudimentary, it doesn't currently identify a class if its name is followed by . Patches welcome.