From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Display scaling? Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 14:57:34 +0200 Message-ID: <83o83yhcxt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <877danm1ds.fsf.ref@yahoo.com> <877danm1ds.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3166"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 26 14:03:41 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nChxc-0000h3-ND for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 14:03:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42196 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nChxb-0004i3-F6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 08:03:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47454) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nChrs-0001rZ-GZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 07:57:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=57902 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nChrr-0007oD-TP; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 07:57:44 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=gHL9/62mvTJxVKhnXdKzUYrfVbRIn2UKhSJCEBIIXn8=; b=Eu2l28YsFQKf cvvDxt3It9OmqrRZXXamHn+oPV5oJZuL/G7uCKpGCvTlFYHD/LzZZaOfmJ8VEcLUfHbX9h252kJ6W 2n4PxXddu73qLR8msS6i4zZDNZviI4dTB1zWpPBqGzQ7HkEGVnnBDpMZFKr/MnhKgvRDlVvUm64Cj Q7SktezOyZwtfFrzks3ThWVDvWRSv4wH/7MCwfgtkK2M2sfiwI78pOzeaJuMK7wiUfipMYZlaqLyt DNgNbJk3sN1KewsRuwJAJrP4X8no2xXyPIphF4q5rO0V79c/6H3gS6v4AQ5v+219fKXGCykOKSUNK KKnsMT4CE9jGILHWIXUOwg==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3369 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nChrp-00059o-6R; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 07:57:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: <877danm1ds.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Wed, 26 Jan 2022 14:55:59 +0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:285420 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 14:55:59 +0800 > > The X and (presumably) W32 ports, however, only scale text on such > monitors, which means things that aren't text (such as the fringes and > boxes) are often displayed too tiny to be legible. > > I think it would be nice to have such scaling on the other ports as > well. We could probably apply the frame's display scale to the width of > its boxes when a face is being realized, and apply the scale to the the > fringe and its bitmaps as well. > > It would be opt-in behaviour, of course. What is your plan to scaling the fringe bitmaps?