From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : emacs-28 windows binaries available from alpha Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 16:35:49 +0200 Message-ID: <83o83dsc6y.fsf@gnu.org> References: <834k5d3hbv.fsf@gnu.org> <83o83l1v51.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0e3vox9.fsf@gnu.org> <83fsoruv2u.fsf@gnu.org> <83o83eudgz.fsf@gnu.org> <83ee4atzh5.fsf@gnu.org> <83v8xlst5p.fsf@gnu.org> <83sfspsks2.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21118"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: dieter@duenenhof-wilhelm.de, corwin@bru.st, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 11 15:37:55 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nIX3Z-00059n-LJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 15:37:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47168 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nIX3Y-000514-HV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 09:37:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47764) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nIX1d-0003Yw-1o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 09:35:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=52236 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nIX1c-0006or-M9; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 09:35:52 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=LmKn+8zaUgFVK6xlvzHr/Pz5QN3ec6LhAnyquZ22iEY=; b=riV0MS7b9lSs SgkgewyWB4ZMHdl8n54GqU0iJf5QCvRFoycGKTuU61J1g/yxl2NTADIeRM8f6QCKReyvvfTRL2npu 0ILUfutSnKz4tKFmG5hYK+0MSoHi8E96P8yB3mk85TyJe2IQ7BMrGmf0q34NvMFPN0+PCtWaF/mfE 7+gX3qVI21T3JSEnF2g4QNJilYZbhh56ySKHHGHj3FuRMl/HOCxsX7UkGH5uMCM/9LOVf0cU9nCgX 8lUxQHWwtZDMIduaejAmribLxcv47j1Y8jbX4AxxBwIu1WSsqjWgAPVw52rdigRem7W28Bw9OsHE0 9YSqDf0iP4RQ0OURalZESw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3061 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nIX1c-0006Og-6d; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 09:35:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Fri, 11 Feb 2022 14:18:45 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:286168 Archived-At: > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: dieter@duenenhof-wilhelm.de, corwin@bru.st, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 14:18:45 +0000 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> 1- let the user know that a native compiled Emacs is being run without > >> access to libgccjit, not only it might not function as expected but > >> most likely I guess that if the user compiled a native compiled Emacs > >> he wants to have it working with native code. So in general I guess > >> it might be informative. > > > > This is unlikely to happen if the user has libgccjit installed: if it > > is found when building Emacs, it will most probably be also found when > > running it. > > Because is unlikely is suspect might be of interest in this case. Maybe so, but we don't provide any similar diagnostics for any other optional DLL. > > So the warning will mostly show when the user installed Emacs built by > > someone else. In which case, the user already made the decision not > > to install libgccjit, so warning the user about that would be in > > many/most cases redundant. > > How do we know the user made this decision intentionally? We assume they read the documentation, which tells them about the optional libraries.