From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59793: 29.0.60; subr.elc is not compiled correctly Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2022 19:00:02 +0200 Message-ID: <83o7sj9ka5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87lenpne48.fsf@163.com> <83cz90erqg.fsf@gnu.org> <87359wr08z.fsf@disroot.org> <0D6CA055-C9DD-425D-9D0B-03B555227E72@gnu.org> <87v8mspfuo.fsf@disroot.org> <83sfhwcq9h.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgc31kov.fsf@disroot.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29331"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: tumashu@163.com, 59793@debbugs.gnu.org To: Akib Azmain Turja Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 04 18:01:38 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p1sN0-0007OK-FW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2022 18:01:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p1sMS-0008Hi-Iz; Sun, 04 Dec 2022 12:01:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p1sMR-0008Fw-3F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2022 12:01:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p1sMQ-00067p-HX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2022 12:01:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p1sMQ-0004FQ-4V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2022 12:01:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2022 17:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59793 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59793-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59793.167017323716312 (code B ref 59793); Sun, 04 Dec 2022 17:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59793) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2022 17:00:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58683 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p1sLz-0004F2-Fe for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2022 12:00:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39054) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p1sLu-0004Et-S1 for 59793@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2022 12:00:34 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p1sLn-00065A-5D; Sun, 04 Dec 2022 12:00:23 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=6YpxdPAcjbceRX4g7kl+pnGmRbJm3olz1YtEBByfxTs=; b=Uwfb52JFItjY l7sTq46pf/cGNqAjb3hdQd30onPGy7wci7aIOFION0iuzGgmlRKvkq3NDA+IGkL0NC1ABtFJXZobf 7gG6O46MLrNUILPl3JotdntsdHPhLohCdE97r8p6UHzo8R+JQkku4b1bBsqBOouzI2PQ5J+kX7a6n R2PLEjtXADD+GDtDJtgNW+s7hz0QZTUFqU79XlwohBhndIurd6VYx/lzw+LMtRzMO2RUqR4KLU54I 7BKEDTRrRon1Cn6OZhts/jvnc/fzWv49NRqNNRsO+faKboWKMqWUD0EBDMrahqzCdNPKtvGe7X/CD S3eV3edwrGeYLlYH+ZO0SA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p1sLm-0002Ov-DM; Sun, 04 Dec 2022 12:00:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87zgc31kov.fsf@disroot.org> (message from Akib Azmain Turja on Sun, 04 Dec 2022 17:18:24 +0600) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:249952 Archived-At: > From: Akib Azmain Turja > Cc: tumashu@163.com, 59793@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2022 17:18:24 +0600 > > > I understand you didn't expect the result of cl-letf*, and were surprised by > > what you saw, but I don't understand why you expect the Emacs development to > > do something about your surprise. > > > > With subr.el (source), the bug59793-yank function overrides > 'insert-for-yank' successfully. > > With subr.elc (compiled byte-code), the function can't override > 'insert-for-yank'. Just try to replace the 'cl-letf' (not 'cl-letf*') > form with an 'error' call, bug59793-yank still just inserts text, which > is, obviously, unexpected. Yes, I understand. > > See above: I understand what you are saying, but not why this is submitted > > as a bug to the Emacs development team. > > Both source and compiled Emacs Lisp code should show the same behavior, > except performance. No, not when you replace the function's definition with the likes of cl-letf. > But 'subr.el' and 'subr.elc' show different behaviors. Isn't this a > byte-compiler bug? No.