From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Android port of Emacs Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 20:54:27 +0300 Message-ID: <83o7lb72y4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83v8fnslfz.fsf@gnu.org> <83edmask4z.fsf@gnu.org> <874jn6fue3.fsf@yahoo.com> <83zg4yr1tf.fsf@gnu.org> <87r0qaee6b.fsf@yahoo.com> <83jzw2qy0l.fsf@gnu.org> <87jzvzopob.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5802"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Manuel Giraud Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 19 19:55:52 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qBJ6V-0001IV-Lt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 19:55:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qBJ5f-00051R-05; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 13:54:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qBJ5T-00050M-PW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 13:54:51 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qBJ5S-0003xr-Bp; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 13:54:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=/+9n2RhKvRiBvpanmxpYGM5YGj2KL49zQI+IUNAhSoM=; b=eLe6rIntuwpYY5RyjA/V A+i/F+vjyZCSB3uMfNL9uZnfStmGnmToYKl+ECE+3rIeXjQGnNT+zA5q89JzVJGmEVtEqkXnsstrs UEgcJ065/xcZBN547nIiGObptkyU9knHgyjy8PLOPbQz4FCV1AroDPl/PoKerHtI2sBCPdEgEPIc1 M86qPRrleRSFqtX6dRhZ6yC9Lokvmi2+CEXNKt2rSIW/luPtCS8WNt7he5gifU59ohMm1m6IgFzES i1EB0iN1Bj0x8GaExd6+3WKF2YPThR1gjiEJ6sE9SwJJEbKvhIQcaD/ouLxw35TP+RzNXeTd5za1x gXAdFjB1RB8nqQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qBJ54-00015r-3z; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 13:54:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87jzvzopob.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> (message from Manuel Giraud on Mon, 19 Jun 2023 09:51:32 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:307058 Archived-At: > From: Manuel Giraud > Cc: Po Lu , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 09:51:32 +0200 > > I'm far from being an Emacs developer but here is my 2 cents anyway. As > Eli said he would not be opposed to drop the NS port (for it to be > handled somewhere else), why not « trade » the NS port for the Android > one? Should the Android port become stale (with zero dev or whatever), > we could later drop this port too? I don't see how this would help or solve anything. Each port is worked on by different people, so it isn't like dropping one will free people to work on the other.