From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62320: 30.0.50; Thoughts about (info "(emacs) Bugs") Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 08:53:21 +0300 Message-ID: <83o7k524ku.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sfdyoext.fsf@web.de> <83bkkm6v8n.fsf@gnu.org> <87bkklcypz.fsf@web.de> <83wn374mmn.fsf@gnu.org> <87zg7vwpp4.fsf@web.de> <838rff7dwm.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8ii8bo7.fsf@web.de> <83h6tzzzri.fsf@gnu.org> <87pm4nuxlr.fsf@web.de> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24618"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, 62320@debbugs.gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 21 07:54:20 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qMj5o-0006CC-6b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 07:54:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qMj5X-00067l-Qm; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 01:54:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qMj5W-00067d-Gv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 01:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qMj5W-0007YA-8h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 01:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qMj5V-0002Ko-UA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 01:54:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 05:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62320 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62320-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62320.16899187828886 (code B ref 62320); Fri, 21 Jul 2023 05:54:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62320) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2023 05:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60378 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qMj4X-0002J5-KN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 01:53:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35284) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qMj4V-0002Ik-QY for 62320@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 01:53:00 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qMj4Q-00075p-Dz; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 01:52:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=Sm0Vh8Ojr3A7DOq0eZr+SjB2q5u0DSfmRnA2VfhKljA=; b=M/ZBGW+rDUQf 91pqZh/T0JFXSz8nPmG2lSbmtxxkyhfKV5BFbHr8do50B30OwtQyRzdaxvsDyrdoGrpLSfRSGTjLi Pq2hxHd5x047TzyGWKOF3azx8EV393A2XJ2AOJFtJA4ocsS47goydNEHek3XhQ43YuLTaoXOQy1Tv vHLHuoIBGGwTAZS2kN8UVSPMEmcBEZY4TQ2FolPR9RdA/+6Q8QS5epuYiICpfgYYrszC/it7kuDlV bZmKW5LI6ZgCNjYRZLF2ShHpfg5hzZA07fCftdhm4VjkL0US8CJbW7wn2ni68NVn0FjSxSLqFIcZG tCqAOLo0qcFv1icDszIdRw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qMj4H-0002oX-LG; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 01:52:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Richard Stallman on Thu, 20 Jul 2023 22:42:02 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:265653 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > Cc: eliz@gnu.org, 62320@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 22:42:02 -0400 > > I suggest that any node over 50 lines long is a long node, so it is good > to split th enode into several nodes that are reasonable in size. > Or at least close. If the node enumerates a long-enough list of actions or checks that belong to the same procedure, breaking it into several nodes makes the reading harder. But of course, I agree with the general principle. Although 50 is too small a number, IME; I think 150 is a better limit.