From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6591: 24.0.50; incorrect doc for `catch' Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 17:38:36 +0300 Message-ID: <83mxtz9zbn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <831vbcbl7n.fsf@gnu.org> <5500EFEE9A854408ABF0FE400497FE2D@us.oracle.com> <83tyo7aiay.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1278774015 26049 80.91.229.12 (10 Jul 2010 15:00:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 15:00:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6591@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 10 17:00:14 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OXbXH-0001Pu-26 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 17:00:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44918 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OXbXG-0008Ao-Nn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 11:00:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36011 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OXbXB-0008Ah-0b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 11:00:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OXbX9-0002gG-Nr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 11:00:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41959) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OXbX9-0002gB-Mb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 11:00:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OXbEk-0006kG-1M; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 10:41:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 14:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6591 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6591-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6591.127877284725917 (code B ref 6591); Sat, 10 Jul 2010 14:41:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6591) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jul 2010 14:40:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OXbEV-0006jx-5X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 10:40:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OXbES-0006js-Cx for 6591@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 10:40:45 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L5C00H00JF7EM00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 6591@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 17:40:40 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.120.144]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L5C008IXJFQ5YJ0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 10 Jul 2010 17:40:39 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 10:41:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:38343 Archived-At: > From: "Drew Adams" > Cc: <6591@debbugs.gnu.org> > Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 07:14:14 -0700 > > > BODY is by definition everything that follows TAG. That's it. Saying > > that there are multiple BODYs breaks the model on which the entire > > description is built. > > Ah! Then the syntax should be (catch TAG . BODY) or similar. ^^^ Why the period?