From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Cleanup of byte-compiled files missing? Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 21:55:10 +0200 Message-ID: <83mxqwpdy9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83sk12w8iw.fsf@gnu.org> <8362xlq9q0.fsf@gnu.org> <5vd3rsh141.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286049325 23554 80.91.229.12 (2 Oct 2010 19:55:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 19:55:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 02 21:55:24 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P28B1-00028v-Qr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 21:55:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35614 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P28B1-0005jw-1l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:55:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42014 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P28At-0005jW-6c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:55:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P28Ar-0005op-JM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:55:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:50090) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P28Ar-0005oW-CE; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:55:13 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L9O00D00HS1GU00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 21:55:07 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.77.74]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L9O00C5PHZSHBE0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 21:55:07 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <5vd3rsh141.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:131257 Archived-At: > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Glenn Morris > Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 14:59:42 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > fatal_error_signal now says: > > > > if (sig == SIGTERM || sig == SIGHUP || sig == SIGINT) > > Fkill_emacs (make_number (sig)); > > > > Shouldn't the SIGINT part require noninteractive to be non-zero, just > > to be on the safe side? > > I don't think it matters. It ought to be impossible to get there via > SIGINT except in batch mode, and if somehow Emacs does get there, it's > going to exit anyway, so it's just a question of if it goes via > kill_emacs (and so calls kill-emacs-hook) or straight to > shut_down_emacs ; and it seems to me it might as well run the hook as not. > > Hmm, maybe the only real difference is the treatment of > Vauto_save_list_file_name. Why bother reasoning about that? It's just one more flag to test, and in a place where speed hardly matters at all.