From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: attribute warn_unused_result Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 11:03:06 +0200 Message-ID: <83mxmaam5x.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4D4B02EF.1080708@cs.ucla.edu> <7C616374-F2D6-4797-A66C-9C4D293B93B6@mit.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296896598 28266 80.91.229.12 (5 Feb 2011 09:03:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 09:03:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, yandros@mit.edu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 05 10:03:14 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ple2z-0005aY-6w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 10:03:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34499 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ple2y-0001Lu-H0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 04:03:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49905 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ple2n-0001LY-PO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 04:03:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ple2m-00065S-Am for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 04:03:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:35634) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ple2m-00065F-29 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 04:03:00 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LG400300ZOACB00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 11:02:59 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.97.124]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LG4002IYZSWWUB0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 11:02:58 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135602 Archived-At: > From: Lennart Borgman > Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 22:15:36 +0100 > Cc: Chad Brown , Emacs-Devel devel , > Paul Eggert > > It would have been much easier to realize that with a little bit more > feedback. Mind reading is difficult face to face and even a little bit > more difficult over the net. I see no need for mind reading. If you looked at the report displayed by "bzr up" or "bzr log", you'd have realized that the file about which the compiler complained was not part of the commit, which should have told you what was the nature of the problem. IOW, before you make a decision, look at the facts at hand.