From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8644: font-locking of multi-author changelog entries Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 23:38:10 +0300 Message-ID: <83mxiugukt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83oc3agvjx.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1305059955 4791 80.91.229.12 (10 May 2011 20:39:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 20:39:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8644@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 10 22:39:10 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QJti0-0004S7-Qy for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:39:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36747 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJthz-0003xn-9z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:39:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52018) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJthw-0003xi-5x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:39:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJthv-0008Ec-8A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:39:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40690) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJthv-0008EY-2Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:39:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QJthu-0001Kd-Fo; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:39:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 20:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8644 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8644-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8644.13050598945062 (code B ref 8644); Tue, 10 May 2011 20:39:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8644) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 May 2011 20:38:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QJth8-0001Jb-L7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:38:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QJth4-0001JN-VQ for 8644@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:38:12 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LKZ00K00YLA5V00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 8644@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 23:38:04 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.234.175]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LKZ00JXEYNENG50@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 10 May 2011 23:38:04 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 16:39:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:46375 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 22:31:02 +0200 > Cc: Glenn Morris , 8644@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Ideas cannot be copyrighted, so > > only the one who wrote the final version should be named, the rest can > > be attributed as "suggested by" or whatever. > > That depends on how much was done by the other people. Sometimes the > one who didn't code a line did all design decisions. "Suggested by" > does not cover it IMHO. Design is still ideas. We could use "design ideas suggested by..." or anything else.