From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11860: 24.1; Arabic - Harakat (diacritics, short vowels) don't appear Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 21:54:51 +0300 Message-ID: <83mx1qd85g.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87628fhujq.fsf@gnu.org> <87pq6m6eng.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1345402559 26139 80.91.229.3 (19 Aug 2012 18:55:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 18:55:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11860@debbugs.gnu.org, smias@yandex.ru To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 19 20:55:57 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T3AfF-0005gw-BK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:55:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42358 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T3AfE-0008Lj-54 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 14:55:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46480) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T3AfC-0008Ld-2W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 14:55:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T3AfB-0005So-50 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 14:55:54 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57496) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T3AfB-0005Sj-1W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 14:55:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T3AfJ-0005uR-QA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 14:56:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 18:56:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11860 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11860-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11860.134540253622681 (code B ref 11860); Sun, 19 Aug 2012 18:56:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11860) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Aug 2012 18:55:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38809 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T3Aeu-0005tm-KN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 14:55:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:64612) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T3Aer-0005tc-RH for 11860@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 14:55:34 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M9000300N43HM00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 11860@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 21:54:51 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M90003Y6N7FEE10@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 21:54:51 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87pq6m6eng.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:63302 Archived-At: > From: Jason Rumney > Cc: eliz@gnu.org, 11860@debbugs.gnu.org, smias@yandex.ru > Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 00:16:19 +0800 > > Or maybe I am misremembering, and it was more about the difficulty in > figuring out which glyphs correspond to which characters in cases where > there is not a one to one correspondance This difficulty is indeed there. How does libotf solve this problem?