From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is debbugs.gnu.org broken? Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 09:07:43 +0200 Message-ID: <83mx09fgsg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8EA6DE6CFF9C476D8C683F39C312E761@us.oracle.com> <87mx0aqdzd.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ehlmqd4i.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <83txuiezfi.fsf@gnu.org> <492255DC94AB4725BA41F5986268E173@us.oracle.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1348902535 11080 80.91.229.3 (29 Sep 2012 07:08:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 07:08:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bzg@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 29 09:08:56 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1THrAQ-0007kM-ND for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 09:08:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49734 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1THrAL-000421-5e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 03:08:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60000) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1THrAI-00041r-CT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 03:08:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1THrAH-0000fw-Gw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 03:08:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:40343) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1THrAG-0000fg-1W; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 03:08:40 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MB300M00NSS4T00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 09:07:42 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MB300LN0NSTVH40@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 09:07:42 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <492255DC94AB4725BA41F5986268E173@us.oracle.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153702 Archived-At: > From: "Drew Adams" > Cc: , > Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:02:25 -0700 > > But does the screen shot I sent look normal to you? It does look normal. Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems to show the last 20 bugs, as requested. > IOW, do you agree that what I am seeing (per the screenshot) is not > what I should be seeing? I think this is what you should be seeing. Again, maybe I'm missing something, and if so, please point out what I don't see.