From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: EOL: unix/dos/mac Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:10:59 +0200 Message-ID: <83mwtqz4po.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ip4fc4xd.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364303557 31770 80.91.229.3 (26 Mar 2013 13:12:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 13:12:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: per.starback@gmail.com, stephen@xemacs.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 26 14:13:00 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UKTgS-0001f8-4S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 14:13:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52241 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UKTg4-0001sf-56 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 09:12:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48585) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UKTfn-0001bU-7c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 09:12:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UKTfl-0006LA-6a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 09:12:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:59674) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UKTfk-0006Kl-Ti for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 09:12:17 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MK900N00QYI0J00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:10:46 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MK900M4DR9YSA90@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:10:46 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158208 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 08:51:45 -0400 > Cc: Per Starb=E4ck , > =09emacs-devel@gnu.org >=20 > But when saving the file, which line ends would we use? > For pre-existing line-ends, we could reproduce what was there befor= e, > but what about new lines? User preference and some heuristics, I guess, as always. E.g., if al= l the lines used the same NLF, use that for new lines; otherwise look a= t some user option for guidance.