From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14644: emacsclient.c fails to compile Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:33:43 +0300 Message-ID: <83mwqnqkmg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <51C01357.3000000@cs.ucla.edu> <83d2rjs8qr.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1371584051 25093 80.91.229.3 (18 Jun 2013 19:34:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, 14644@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 18 21:34:10 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Up1fO-00070U-Aw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:34:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53020 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Up1fN-0002Hl-TW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:34:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38964) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Up1fI-0002Ce-6y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:34:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Up1fH-0001ZN-8y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:34:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59450) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Up1fH-0001ZH-61 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:34:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Up1fG-0007l3-U6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:34:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14644 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14644-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14644.137158403229787 (code B ref 14644); Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14644) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2013 19:33:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53765 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Up1f6-0007kM-EI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:33:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:56436) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Up1f3-0007k3-Lf for 14644@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:33:50 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MOL00L00SRWP100@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 14644@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:33:38 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MOL00LN8T01GN50@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:33:38 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:75309 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: Paul Eggert , 14644@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:30:15 -0400 > > > (Idle speculation) I wonder if this issue happens if: > > 1) you build Emacs with a system where the system getopt is not good > enough for some reason, so libgnu.a gets a getopt compat definition > compiled in. > > 2) you update your system and get a new glibc, so that system getopt is > now "good enough" > > 3) you rebuild Emacs without deleting lib/libgnu.a. Shouldn't .deps/getopt.Po catch that?