From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14666: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:44:33 +0300 Message-ID: <83mwqlq40u.fsf@gnu.org> References: <015b7f9e-f365-4c91-bdf7-2fc8f08b256a@default> <83sj0eozd9.fsf@gnu.org> <83ppvioxno.fsf@gnu.org> <83obb2ownx.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1371671122 2850 80.91.229.3 (19 Jun 2013 19:45:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:45:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14666@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 19 21:45:21 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UpOJf-0006Vs-Fz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:45:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51479 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpOJe-0007q0-OA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:45:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44121) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpOJX-0007nY-Ux for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:45:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpOJU-0001rI-Fw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:45:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33800) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpOJU-0001qj-8l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:45:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UpOJS-0004Uk-IP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:45:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14666 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 14666-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14666.137167107417215 (code B ref 14666); Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14666) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jun 2013 19:44:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56348 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UpOJ0-0004Tb-HX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:44:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:52418) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UpOIy-0004TC-6s for 14666@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:44:33 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MON00G00O3R0K00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 14666@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:44:25 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MON00FJ6O61R650@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:44:25 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:75360 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:23:12 +0200 > Cc: 14666@debbugs.gnu.org > > Still, shouldn't that happen much more frequently? Or it is > WM_IME_STARTCOMPOSITION infrecuent? (I would've guessed it would > mostly show up in localized version of Windows, BTW...) That's what I thought originally, but then I found this in w32_draw_window_cursor: PostMessage (hwnd, WM_IME_STARTCOMPOSITION, 0, 0); IOW, we send this message to ourselves each time we are about to draw the cursor, which has got to be frequent enough...