From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64 Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 18:34:05 +0200 Message-ID: <83mw7pbxc2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r3x2qyjg.fsf@wanadoo.es> <546973D0.7050306@cs.ucla.edu> <87ioieqxbb.fsf@wanadoo.es> <54697A45.1040505@cs.ucla.edu> <87egt1rhy4.fsf@wanadoo.es> <546A11D5.3090402@cs.ucla.edu> <838uj9ddl5.fsf@gnu.org> <546A1C6C.3000803@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416242078 21055 80.91.229.3 (17 Nov 2014 16:34:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:34:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 17 17:34:30 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XqPG1-0006kl-KP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:34:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48772 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqPG1-00021Q-8s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:34:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55303) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqPFt-0001qP-2w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:34:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqPFn-0001yT-UL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:34:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:53831) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqPFn-0001xw-GS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:34:15 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NF600E00YZX4500@mtaout29.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 18:32:26 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NF600DTRZA2I210@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 18:32:26 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <546A1C6C.3000803@cs.ucla.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.185 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177444 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 08:03:56 -0800 > From: Paul Eggert > CC: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Isn't that so in the patch? Which parts of the patch, excluding > > configure.ac, would you consider not Windows-specific? > > Sorry, I didn't read the rest of the patch carefully. If this symbol is needed > only for code specific to that platform I agree that ms-w32.h is a better home > for its definition. AFAICS, all the suggested changes are in w32-specific files, yes.