From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bidirectional text and URLs Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 19:38:04 +0200 Message-ID: <83mw7463cz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a93cngwv.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <837fyfml31.fsf@gnu.org> <874mtio7wh.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83r3wml8kq.fsf@gnu.org> <83a938aeuc.fsf@gnu.org> <838uir8huv.fsf@gnu.org> <83388y6rb3.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1417628296 16307 80.91.229.3 (3 Dec 2014 17:38:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 17:38:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 03 18:38:09 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XwDsP-0000a4-Fk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 18:38:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42692 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwDsP-0004SZ-44 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 12:38:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41728) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwDsG-0004Rm-Ao for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 12:38:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwDsA-000066-DT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 12:38:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il ([80.179.55.183]:50395) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwDsA-000061-5h; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 12:37:54 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NG000100OMBY100@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 19:33:34 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NG000013ORXFI20@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 19:33:34 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.183 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:178735 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 03:38:59 -0500 > From: Richard Stallman > CC: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > But in general, things that are not dangerous don't > > warrant a warning. > > RTL is dangerous in SOME CASES, and that's enough reason to warn > about it. My point is that we should try to narrow down the cases where we issue a warning, ideally only to those SOME CASES where they can actually be harmful.