From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19511: 25.0.50; Failed assertions in redisplay() code. (dispnew.c:1405; xdisp.c:17524) Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 20:36:48 +0200 Message-ID: <83mw5x8473.fsf@gnu.org> References: <878uhiji5m.fsf@winky.hogwarts> <83tx058bjm.fsf@gnu.org> <87ioglxfm4.fsf@winky.hogwarts> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1420483826 16386 80.91.229.3 (5 Jan 2015 18:50:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 18:50:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: spinuvit@gmail.com, 19511@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Matthias Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 05 19:50:18 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8CWd-0002vT-3V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 19:37:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33552 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8CWc-0003uj-Ih for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 13:37:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58774) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8CWX-0003r3-64 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 13:37:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8CWT-0005Hq-VY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 13:37:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56606) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8CWT-0005Hk-T1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 13:37:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8CWT-0005az-Ix for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 13:37:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 18:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19511 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19511-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19511.142048300721479 (code B ref 19511); Mon, 05 Jan 2015 18:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19511) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2015 18:36:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37739 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8CWE-0005aN-Md for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 13:36:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:40668) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8CWB-0005aD-GO for 19511@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 13:36:44 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NHP00800VJ2WE00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 19511@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 20:36:42 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NHP008J0VP5QCB0@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 20:36:42 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87ioglxfm4.fsf@winky.hogwarts> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:98048 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Matthias > Cc: 19511-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Vitalie Spinu > Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 19:10:59 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > I have now disabled that optimization for packages which commit such > > atrocities, so Polymode is now merely a performance killer, not a > > crasher. > > The decrease in performance is noticeable There really is nothing else I can do under these circumstances. I initially tried not to reject so many optimizations, but that left strange artifacts on the screen, so I was forced to do it more thoroughly. Hopefully, the underlying problem will be solved in Polymode, and performance will be back where it was before.