From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Generalize start-process with keyword args Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 20:19:40 +0200 Message-ID: <83mw3bxz9f.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87d24d3uwz.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> <83pp87y6iu.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1426616490 23192 80.91.229.3 (17 Mar 2015 18:21:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:21:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ueno@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 17 19:21:21 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YXw7F-00038a-9t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:21:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56402 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXw7E-0007Rx-As for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:21:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45756) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXw5t-00060w-TF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:19:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXw5o-0000iP-0y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:19:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il ([80.179.55.180]:39969) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXw5n-0000iG-PH; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:19:51 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NLD00O00BK4QO00@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 20:12:05 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NLD00N8BBW5NB20@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 20:12:05 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.180 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:183966 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: ueno@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:08:53 -0400 > > >> Bad idea. If she wants `no-conversion' (a bad name, for sure, she > >> should say `binary' instead), then she should say so explicitly rather > >> than by using nil. > > Unfortunately, that ship sailed long ago. > > Not for the new `make-process' function. What, you mean it will implement its own encoding and decoding machinery?