From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: string> missing?
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 22:13:58 +0300
Message-ID: <83mw0gr4eh.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87oakxkvqw.fsf@petton.fr> <83zj4grgkc.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87sia8n8b5.fsf@petton.fr> <87zj4gu821.fsf@gnu.org>
	<oirsia8iyl7.fsf@gmail.com> <83sia8rdkm.fsf@gnu.org>
	<oirr3psixh1.fsf@gmail.com> <83pp5crbfd.fsf@gnu.org>
	<oirpp5civmg.fsf@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1433358872 19201 80.91.229.3 (3 Jun 2015 19:14:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 19:14:32 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: nicolas@petton.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org, tsdh@gnu.org
To: Nick Andryshak <nandryshak@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 03 21:14:25 2015
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1Z0E7M-0005os-6R
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 21:14:24 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37335 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1Z0E7L-0004eb-Ip
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 15:14:23 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49643)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1Z0E79-0004dx-Pa
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 15:14:12 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1Z0E75-0004ol-Qj
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 15:14:11 -0400
Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:47938)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1Z0E75-0004of-IY; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 15:14:07 -0400
Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il
	(HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NPD00700UOHA700@mtaout29.012.net.il>;
	Wed, 03 Jun 2015 22:13:26 +0300 (IDT)
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout29.012.net.il
	(HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id
	<0NPD00GZUUQEHI90@mtaout29.012.net.il>;
	Wed, 03 Jun 2015 22:13:26 +0300 (IDT)
In-reply-to: <oirpp5civmg.fsf@gmail.com>
X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x
X-Received-From: 80.179.55.185
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:186997
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/186997>

> From: Nick Andryshak <nandryshak@gmail.com>
> Cc: tsdh@gnu.org, nicolas@petton.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 12:50:47 -0400
> 
> What good reasons are there specifically to keep the '>' function? What
> does '(> A B)' do that '(< B A)' doesn't?

If you want to argue for removal of one of them, feel free.

But that doesn't reflect in any way on the issue at hand.  Once again,
there's no requirement to be "consistent" in this sense.