From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: IDE Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 19:50:40 +0200 Message-ID: <83mvv442vj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <831td3t62e.fsf@gnu.org> <561A6199.1020901@cumego.com> <561B9D87.70504@yandex.ru> <87vb9wcpw9.fsf@esperi.org.uk> <83eggkwdgh.fsf@gnu.org> <83611ww5uc.fsf@gnu.org> <83si4xbi2m.fsf@gnu.org> <878u6pcs74.fsf@igel.home> <83io5tbcye.fsf@gnu.org> <87bnblnzn7.fsf@wanadoo.es> <562E8E51.40006@yandex.ru> <877fm9nuxv.fsf@wanadoo.es> <562EACD9.1030807@yandex.ru> <87y4epmdpr.fsf@wanadoo.es> <562ED468.1010907@siege-engine.com> <87bnblnhfx.fsf@vostro.rath.org> <83a8r5as2g.fsf@gnu.org> <874mhdnel8.fsf@vostro.rath.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445968256 5241 80.91.229.3 (27 Oct 2015 17:50:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 17:50:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Nikolaus Rath Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 27 18:50:40 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zr8ON-0007yx-Vh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 18:50:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33055 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zr8ON-0005PN-ED for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 13:50:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36539) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zr8OI-0005MO-5P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 13:50:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zr8OC-0005pB-AN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 13:50:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:64881) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zr8OC-0005oy-1y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 13:50:28 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NWW00A0046QJT00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 19:50:26 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NWW00ASH481ET90@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 19:50:26 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <874mhdnel8.fsf@vostro.rath.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:192740 Archived-At: > From: Nikolaus Rath > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 21:02:43 -0700 > > On Oct 27 2015, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> From: Nikolaus Rath > >> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 20:01:06 -0700 > >> > >> My impression that CEDET/Semantic doesn't lack functionality, but > >> end-user documentation. > > > > Detailed bug reports about missing or incomplete CEDET documentation > > are welcome. > > It's hard to provide details about undocumented functionality, if one > doesn't know which functionality the code provides (since it's not > documented). I guess I've misunderstood you, sorry. You said: > Unfortunately, at least for me the "one bit of code" was not at all > obvious after reading the CEDET documentation. So while I believe that > any of Global/idutils/cscope would be good enough for the majority of my > use-cases, I wasn't able to make CEDET use any of them (or maybe CEDET > uses them, but I'm not actually invoking cedet with M-.?). My interpretation of that, perhaps incorrect, was that you tried to use some functionality and tried to find documentation about it, but either the documentation was inadequate or completely missing. Based on that interpretation, I suggested that you report what you tried to figure out from the documentation, but couldn't. > The best I can do is this: judging from this thread, Semantic offers a > lot of things that are not enabled when one just follows the "Using > Semantic" section of the info manual. There should be documentation > about how to enable and use those features. A list if such issues that lack proper documentation would also be useful, if you cannot provide a more detailed information. TIA.