From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Edebug: avoid messages on 'f' command Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 18:01:33 +0300 Message-ID: <83mvo3fcxe.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160505131010.GC1950@acm.fritz.box> <83vb2rfiys.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1462546926 7165 80.91.229.3 (6 May 2016 15:02:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 15:02:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Pogonyshev Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 06 17:02:04 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ayhGW-0008VH-A4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 17:02:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58740 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayhGN-00013P-Ef for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 11:01:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49909) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayhG6-0000pV-HM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 11:01:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayhFv-0007FW-1f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 11:01:33 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:45989) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayhFu-0007Ea-VF; Fri, 06 May 2016 11:01:26 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2926 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ayhFo-0006Is-7x; Fri, 06 May 2016 11:01:21 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Paul Pogonyshev on Fri, 6 May 2016 16:25:07 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203645 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 16:25:07 +0200 > From: Paul Pogonyshev > Cc: Alan Mackenzie , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On 6 May 2016 at 14:51, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > How about filing a feature-request bug for these, so that they aren't > > forgotten? > > Frankly, it would help to have a visual bugtracker like Bugzilla or > Jira. I usually find myself lost in Bugzilla, but that's me. > I sent one feature request with M-x report-emacs-bug now, and I > have no idea if it arrived there at all and where to look at it. What was the subject? (The bug-tracker search engine returns almost 200 hits for "Pogonyshev", so it's hard to know which of those you mean.) Usually, when you file a bug report, you get a response mail from the bug tracker with the details and the bug number, so I don't understand why you are unsure whether the report arrived. Anyway, I'd still urge you to file a feature request. What can you possibly lose? Thanks.