From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] feature/integrated-elpa 4f6df43 15/23: README added Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 15:34:09 +0300 Message-ID: <83mvipmuri.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160916203414.25203.87032@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <87vaxsjmvu.fsf@russet.org.uk> <878tunj2wr.fsf@russet.org.uk> <874m582ixv.fsf@russet.org.uk> <871t0apsxm.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87shsm7hi6.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83a8eucwi2.fsf@gnu.org> <878tudgwlq.fsf@russet.org.uk> <8360pgoyo4.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1jn3ws9.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83a8eqoi08.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1jlacsh.fsf@russet.org.uk> <867f9t4n4t.fsf@realize.ch> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1475240448 2861 195.159.176.226 (30 Sep 2016 13:00:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk To: Alain Schneble Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 30 15:00:41 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bpxQY-0007bq-U7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 15:00:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44364 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bpxQX-0000sQ-Gr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 09:00:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48115) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bpx1A-0003PO-RD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 08:34:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bpx16-0005vI-DQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 08:34:19 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:46282) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bpx16-0005up-AS; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 08:34:16 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4370 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bpx13-0005bk-OI; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 08:34:14 -0400 In-reply-to: <867f9t4n4t.fsf@realize.ch> (message from Alain Schneble on Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:56:18 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207915 Archived-At: > From: Alain Schneble > CC: Eli Zaretskii , , > > Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:56:18 +0200 > > phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) writes: > > There's also d) where an elpa package would just go into it's > corresponding directory under EMACS/lisp, e.g. EMACS/lisp/org if org is > an elpa package. That's what I'd prefer, yes. > Of course, there's a chance of name clashes here, but both GNU Emacs > and GNU elpa are under the same control IIUC. Exactly, and so we can easily make sure that no name clashes happen. Besides, such name clashes would be bad even if ELPA wasn't under our control, since loading a package could then load an incorrect one, depending on how load-path is ordered.