From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 8275687: Fix a segfault due to failure to
	realize some faces
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 17:31:22 +0300
Message-ID: <83mvc694g5.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87d1d4w3jf.fsf@calancha-pc> <87r31jbxxr.fsf@luca>
	<83shlz8nft.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvc7ayd3.fsf@luca>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org
X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1490625145 31160 195.159.176.226 (27 Mar 2017 14:32:25 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 14:32:25 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, tino.calancha@gmail.com
To: Andreas Politz <politza@hochschule-trier.de>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 27 16:32:21 2017
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1csVgq-0006sM-8Y
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:32:12 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47064 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1csVgw-000084-9h
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 10:32:18 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51013)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1csVg6-00007p-DV
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 10:31:27 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1csVg1-0008QJ-LZ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 10:31:26 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57004)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1csVg1-0008Q9-IZ; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 10:31:21 -0400
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3718
	helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1csVg0-0001fE-Pa; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 10:31:21 -0400
In-reply-to: <87mvc7ayd3.fsf@luca> (message from Andreas Politz on Mon, 27 Mar
	2017 10:59:52 +0200)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:213415
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/213415>

> From: Andreas Politz <politza@hochschule-trier.de>
> Cc: tino.calancha@gmail.com,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 10:59:52 +0200
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> > can someone reproduce the following issue?
> >> >
> >> > emacs -Q ~
> >> > ;; The Dired buffer appear messy: Some columns are duplicated.
> >> > ;; Just hit for instance, 'g' clean the buffer and show it correctly.  If you
> >> > ;; hit arrow keys instead, for instance <down>, the buffer keeps messy.
> >> 
> >> Yes, I can.  C-l makes it go away as well as entering the mini-buffer.
> >
> > This indicates it's a redisplay problem.
> >
> > Did the problem go away with my latest changes to xdisp.c on master?
> 
> Yes, it did.

Great, thanks for testing.