From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 21:58:54 +0300 Message-ID: <83mv66z66p.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1017454172.910810.1504618695244@mail.libero.it> <83tw0ezgi1.fsf@gnu.org> <1146932094.13821.1504798935795@mail.libero.it> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1504810838 11824 195.159.176.226 (7 Sep 2017 19:00:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 19:00:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: angelo.g0@libero.it, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Copley Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 07 21:00:24 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dq220-0001Xc-GN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 21:00:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41796 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dq224-0005Cl-KA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 15:00:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57555) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dq21J-0004pj-AJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 14:59:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dq21E-0004xn-Pg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 14:59:21 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41330) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dq21E-0004xh-MD; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 14:59:16 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2170 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dq21C-0000m8-1R; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 14:59:16 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Richard Copley on Thu, 7 Sep 2017 18:52:35 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:217988 Archived-At: > From: Richard Copley > Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 18:52:35 +0100 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Emacs Development > > 18446744065119617024 is 1<<64. > The other number is (1<<64) - (1<<33) - (1<<2). Yes, I know. I just don't understand why GCC things that nglyphs * sizeof (WORD) * 2 can have a value in this range. The type of nglyphs is 'int', and sizeof(WORD) gives 2. So the range should be between 0 (or 4) and 4 times INT_MAX, which is nowhere near the values GCC displays.