From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#29801: 25.3; ispell cannot detect installed dictionaries Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 20:33:17 +0200 Message-ID: <83mv2alij6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y3lwgnce.fsf@hornet.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <83r2rnnb8l.fsf@gnu.org> <87po77ho28.fsf@gmx.com> <83po77n9h3.fsf@gnu.org> <87lghvhjij.fsf@gmx.com> <83lghvm8dd.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1513967538 667 195.159.176.226 (22 Dec 2017 18:32:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 18:32:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: basilio@gmx.com, 29801@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 22 19:32:13 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eSS7A-0008Cd-JS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 19:32:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33373 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eSS99-0007pN-0t for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 13:34:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43643) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eSS8z-0007nq-66 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 13:34:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eSS8w-0003BY-0f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 13:34:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39619) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eSS8v-0003BU-ST for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 13:34:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eSS8v-00053e-MK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 13:34:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 18:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29801 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 29801-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B29801.151396760819403 (code B ref 29801); Fri, 22 Dec 2017 18:34:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29801) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Dec 2017 18:33:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48300 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eSS8O-00052t-F3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 13:33:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52147) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eSS8M-00052f-As for 29801@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 13:33:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eSS8D-0002lU-Ur for 29801@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 13:33:21 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57841) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eSS8D-0002lJ-QE; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 13:33:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2592 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eSS8D-0003vg-0f; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 13:33:17 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Glenn Morris on Fri, 22 Dec 2017 13:04:08 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:141389 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: Basilio , 29801@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 13:04:08 -0500 > > > "(but really Aspell \\([0-9]+\\.[0-9.]+\\([-._+ ]?[a-zA-Z0-9]+\\)?\\)?)" > > I see that the only thing ispell.el uses the numeric version for is to > test if it is >= 0.60. aspell 0.60 was released in 2004. Even RHEL6 has > aspell 0.60.6. So IMO ispell.el can discard the version checking > entirely, and just look for "really Aspell". Why would we want to make a change that gains us nothing at all, and at "best" breaks old systems?