From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#29165: 26.0.90; can't use some code byte-compiled under emacs 24 Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 20:01:16 +0200 Message-ID: <83mv17qefn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <6eh8u7x5be.fsf@just-testing.permabit.com> <87375r7f0g.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <9f1e7a1f-bfc0-43a4-9acb-cf69b85587be@default> <5C8038D7-FF85-4C42-A728-F3F85CDAC85C@permabit.com> <87efpb46sp.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <3EB0E53F-4B99-44C2-9F2E-1125A33E408B@permabit.com> <87r2rvb7c2.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87po64npva.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83wp0bqjug.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1wbnpit.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1516557618 31759 195.159.176.226 (21 Jan 2018 18:00:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 18:00:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 29165@debbugs.gnu.org, raeburn@permabit.com, p.stephani2@gmail.com, schwab@linux-m68k.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 21 19:00:13 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1edJuZ-0007aX-7k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 19:00:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40480 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edJwZ-0000Rv-LF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 13:02:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38629) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edJwU-0000Rb-0G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 13:02:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edJwQ-0003g5-Ub for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 13:02:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57644) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edJwQ-0003fi-S8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 13:02:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1edJwQ-0004hM-Hi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 13:02:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 18:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29165 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 29165-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B29165.151655771218039 (code B ref 29165); Sun, 21 Jan 2018 18:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29165) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jan 2018 18:01:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37308 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1edJwF-0004gt-P9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 13:01:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47567) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1edJwE-0004gZ-9U for 29165@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 13:01:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edJw6-0003J6-0o for 29165@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 13:01:45 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:48423) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1edJvv-0003Ai-V4; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 13:01:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2250 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1edJvv-0000dS-6m; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 13:01:31 -0500 In-reply-to: <87k1wbnpit.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> (message from Noam Postavsky on Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:30:02 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:142352 Archived-At: > From: Noam Postavsky > Cc: rgm@gnu.org, 29165@debbugs.gnu.org, raeburn@permabit.com, p.stephani2@gmail.com, schwab@linux-m68k.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca > Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 11:30:02 -0500 > > > Is it important enough to justify one more pretest, after 26.0.91, and > > delay the release by a few more weeks? Because that's what would be > > needed if we install this on the release branch. > > Hmm, no, I think these edge cases are not important enough to delay the > release. > > > Besides, this change was introduced more than a year ago, and we did > > that in clear understanding that it changes behavior. So "closer to > > Emacs 25" doesn't sound like a convincing argument in this case, > > because we gave up that similarity up front. > > Well, the unfortunate thing about waiting is that we get more strict in > v26 and then turn around in v27 and (partially) reverse the decision. > But still, as I said above, not worth delaying the release over it. OK, then please push to master, and thanks.