From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#30364: 26.0.91; thread crash on macos Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 20:33:24 +0200 Message-ID: <83mv0496dn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <871shj7k0n.fsf@gmail.com> <83k1vbbhvv.fsf@gnu.org> <83inavbg3p.fsf@gnu.org> <83eflic32p.fsf@gnu.org> <83zi469rge.fsf@gnu.org> <83vaeu9mtn.fsf@gnu.org> <83o9km9jr5.fsf@gnu.org> <83inau9hqa.fsf@gnu.org> <83eflhac8i.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1519065142 24860 195.159.176.226 (19 Feb 2018 18:32:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 18:32:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 30364@debbugs.gnu.org, alan@idiocy.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, npostavs@gmail.com, aaronjensen@gmail.com, schwab@linux-m68k.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 19 19:32:17 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1enqER-0005ZH-Lc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 19:32:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51798 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1enqGT-0000r9-Tk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 13:34:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47666) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1enqGJ-0000pi-EG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 13:34:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1enqGI-0001ue-C6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 13:34:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43708) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1enqGI-0001ua-9J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 13:34:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1enqGI-0006t7-3O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 13:34:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 18:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30364 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 30364-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30364.151906522726453 (code B ref 30364); Mon, 19 Feb 2018 18:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 30364) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2018 18:33:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51605 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1enqG3-0006sb-1c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 13:33:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56603) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1enqG1-0006sP-MX for 30364@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 13:33:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1enqFv-0001ga-RT for 30364@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 13:33:40 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:36371) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1enqFZ-0001TE-Cp; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 13:33:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2716 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1enqFY-0001wd-10; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 13:33:16 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Paul Eggert on Mon, 19 Feb 2018 09:24:32 -0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:143469 Archived-At: > Cc: npostavs@gmail.com, 30364@debbugs.gnu.org, > npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, alan@idiocy.org > From: Paul Eggert > Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 09:24:32 -0800 > > A 64-bit Emacs should need more stack space than a 32-bit Emacs, yes. It > wouldn't be double the space, since not everything on the stack is a pointer or > an EMACS_INT. If you really want to fine-tune it you can also depend on the > width of EMACS_INT. Getting it "just right" would be a bit tricky. > > 8 MiB/thread for 64-bit Emacs sounds OK to me. I wouldn't cheap out on 64-bit > platforms. Thanks. I guess we should go with 4MB for 32-bit builds and 8MB for 64-bit.