From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31919: 26.1.50; Lisp Debugger doesn't work when at stack limit Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2018 12:39:32 +0300 Message-ID: <83muvcmx4b.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a7rprokq.fsf@runbox.com> <87vaa4f8ty.fsf@runbox.com> <83vaa4p1uc.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2krfsez.fsf@runbox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1530351488 16175 195.159.176.226 (30 Jun 2018 09:38:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2018 09:38:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 31919@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gemini Lasswell Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 30 11:38:04 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fZCKR-00046o-PS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 11:38:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46257 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fZCMZ-0005sG-5n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 05:40:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36098) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fZCMR-0005qg-Jy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 05:40:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fZCMM-0000s7-R8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 05:40:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60692) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fZCMM-0000s0-NY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 05:40:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fZCMM-0000xo-GO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 05:40:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2018 09:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31919 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 31919-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31919.15303515733664 (code B ref 31919); Sat, 30 Jun 2018 09:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31919) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jun 2018 09:39:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40356 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fZCLt-0000x2-D3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 05:39:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45041) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fZCLs-0000wq-Hp for 31919@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 05:39:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fZCLi-0008Lu-Em for 31919@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 05:39:27 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:58739) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fZCLi-0008Lp-AF; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 05:39:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4986 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fZCLh-0006cj-NK; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 05:39:22 -0400 In-reply-to: <87r2krfsez.fsf@runbox.com> (message from Gemini Lasswell on Wed, 27 Jun 2018 21:26:12 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:148002 Archived-At: > From: Gemini Lasswell > Cc: 31919@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 21:26:12 -0700 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Yes, but please add a comment there describing the reason. How much > > more depth out of 40 is actually needed to allow cl-print calls, and > > how much is safety margin? > > I determined by experiment that 77 needs to be added to > max-lisp-eval-depth to permit the debugger to print > ((1 (2 (3 (4 (5 (6 (7 (8))))))))). So I changed the increment to 100. > But I really have no idea what is reasonable for a safety margin. > Here's a new patch with comments. Thanks, this LGTM for emacs-26.