From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Finding the dump Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 18:56:21 +0200 Message-ID: <83munm3uq2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83munr8jb1.fsf@gnu.org> <838szb8ey9.fsf@gnu.org> <83d0oj62bc.fsf@gnu.org> <87ef8z4g1m.fsf@igel.home> <838sz75u7p.fsf@gnu.org> <877eer4e4x.fsf@igel.home> <835zub5p3i.fsf@gnu.org> <8736pf408v.fsf@igel.home> <83womq3z5c.fsf@gnu.org> <871s4yxfvb.fsf@igel.home> <83o9823xcq.fsf@gnu.org> <87womqvyy4.fsf@igel.home> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="207829"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 27 17:56:49 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gnnjk-000ryX-Qh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 17:56:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47817 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gnnjj-0006C9-Rs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 11:56:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43532) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gnnjc-0006Bp-8J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 11:56:41 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36240) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gnnjZ-000510-Pz; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 11:56:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4238 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gnnjZ-0008GZ-Cu; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 11:56:37 -0500 In-reply-to: <87womqvyy4.fsf@igel.home> (message from Andreas Schwab on Sun, 27 Jan 2019 17:37:39 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:232727 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 17:37:39 +0100 > Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > >> Having to use --dump-file is awkward. > > > > When you type it on the command line, yes. But we are talking about a > > shell script, where you add the --dump-file option once and for all. > > It's still awkward, because you have to know the full name, which > depends on the version and architecture. So your proposal is to have all the *.pdmp files in the same directory, regardless of the version and architecture? That's quite a deviation from the current arrangement and policies.